Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
My only retort is that if any sort of anaylsis is left exclusively to those in attendance/there it witness it live (whether it is music, history, cultural events, political events, sports, ect) then we would be living very boring, sheltered, closed off lives, exempt from so much perspective and information that has happened outside of our own personal, eye-witness experiences (which are quite few and limited).
I do understand and agree with your point of how being there completely changes the experience... this goes for literally any experience. I also see the other side, however, our side, where we can inform ourselves in focused, educated, but perhaps limited, arenas in order to formulate an opinion about an experience or event, in some capacity.